César Chávez, Lust, and the Tall Poppy Syndrome.
Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. Matt 7:15 (ESV)
Australians cut down tall poppies (TPs) because they are envious of them and want everyone to have the same stature, or so the story goes. Their egalitarian roots date back to their founding as a British penal colony. I have never been there, so I cannot say whether this is true or false.
In America, we aren't as envious of our TPs as Aussies are, but we still cut some down. The reason isn't that they stand out, but that they have committed an egregious act, and we feel justified in cutting them down because they don't deserve their status.
I divide American tall poppy syndrome (TPS) into two categories: peer-to-peer (private) and public (see Anatomy of the TALL POPPY SYNDROME). Dark emotions, although distinct, are shared by both groups. In peer-to-peer cutting down, interactions involve ordinary people within their tribes—families, schools, workplaces, and neighborhoods. We cut down some public TPs, like the Aussies and metaphor, but mostly after they exhibited bad behavior.
The bulk of bad behavior, both the cutter and the TP, is identified in the seven deadly sins (see The Tall Poppy Syndrome & The Seven Deadly Sins). The TP's behavior often includes pride, the source of many other negative emotions, lust, and greed. I have labeled these the "unhappy triad," and they often occur in the same person (see Robert Menendez, Greed and the Tall Poppy Syndrome - Public Service or Public Trough?).
Social movements are collective, organized efforts by individuals or organizations to address political or social issues. The primary focus is to create social change or to resist aspects of society, with a focus on issues such as human rights, the environment, and political reforms. Common methods employ protests, demonstrations, strikes, and lobbying to achieve their goals.
The #MeToo movement in the United States began as a survivor-centered effort to speak openly about sexual violence and harassment, and it surged into the national spotlight in 2017 after the hashtag went viral. It helped many people come forward, pushed powerful men out of office or public roles, and shifted public expectations about accountability in workplaces and institutions.
The movement was originally started by activist Tarana Burke in 2006 to support survivors, especially young women of color. When the hashtag spread in 2017, it gave millions of people a way to say “me too” and share experiences that had long been hidden or ignored.
In the U.S., #MeToo changed how sexual harassment and assault were discussed in public, in workplaces, and in the law. It led to new workplace policies, state-level legal reforms, and federal changes, including limits on certain nondisclosure agreements and stronger options for survivors to bring claims.
It also sparked debate about fairness, due process, and the limits of social media activism, but its central effect was to make sexual misconduct harder to dismiss as an individual problem. Americans increasingly viewed harassment and assault as issues that institutions should address, not just survivors should endure.
The United Farm Workers movement grew out of the 1960s farmworker struggle in California, when César Chávez, Dolores Huerta, Larry Itliong, and other organizers united workers to demand fair pay, safer conditions, and dignity on the job. A major breakthrough came with the Delano grape strike and nationwide boycotts, which turned a local labor fight into a broader social movement supported by consumers, churches, and civil rights allies.
The movement began when farmworkers, many of them Filipino American and Mexican American, organized against low wages and harsh working conditions in the fields. Through marches, fasts, and boycotts, the union won national attention and helped secure better contracts and legal protections for agricultural workers, including California’s landmark farm labor relations law in 1975.
Over time, the UFW became a lasting symbol of Latino and labor rights activism in the United States. Although its membership later declined, its impact endured in labor organizing, immigrant advocacy, and the broader fight for farmworker rights.
Dolores Huerta is a major labor and civil rights activist who grew up in Stockton, California, where her mother’s example and the harsh realities faced by farmworkers shaped her lifelong commitment to justice. In the 1950s and 1960s, she helped organize farmworkers, co-founded the National Farm Workers Association with César Chávez, and became a key leader in the movement that later became the United Farm Workers.
She was especially important in boycotts and organizing efforts that won better wages and working conditions for farmworkers, and she later expanded her activism to include women’s rights and political representation for Latinos. Huerta remains widely honored as one of the most influential organizers in U.S. history.
César Chávez was one of the most important labor organizers in U.S. history, especially for farmworkers. Born in 1927 in Yuma, Arizona, he worked as a farm laborer, served in the Navy, and later joined the Community Service Organization, where he learned organizing skills that shaped the rest of his life.
In 1962, Chávez co-founded the National Farm Workers Association with Dolores Huerta and others, which later merged into the United Farm Workers. His central work was to improve the lives of agricultural workers through nonviolent organizing: strikes, marches, boycotts, and public pressure campaigns. The most famous of these was the Delano grape strike and boycott, which helped bring farmworker labor conditions into the national spotlight and won union recognition and better protections for many workers.
Chávez also tried to build more than a union. He helped create practical support systems for workers, including an insurance plan, a credit union, and a newspaper, and he tied the movement to broader ideas about dignity, Catholic social teaching, and civil rights. Later in life, he expanded the UFW’s reach beyond California, but the movement also faced internal tensions, including disputes over tactics and his stance on undocumented immigration.
Politicians, never missing a chance to virtue signal or garner votes, joined in. In 1994, Bill Clinton posthumously awarded Chávez the Presidential Medal of Freedom (died in 1993). In 2011, Barack Obama designated March 31 as a federal commemorative holiday to celebrate his birthday. A year later, Obama dedicated the César E. Chávez National Monument. Joe Biden put his bust in the Oval Office. Streets, parks, schools, and buildings were named for Chávez, especially in California.
In March 2026, major news outlets reported new allegations of sexual abuse against Chávez. A New York Times investigation reported accusations that he sexually abused two girls who were minors at the time, and that the pattern may have extended over several years. Dolores Huerta also publicly said Chávez raped her in the 1960s and described one incident as coercive sex in a car in a remote field, and another as sex against her will in a setting where she felt trapped.
These allegations sparked a viral reassessment of his legacy. The reaction was swift, not a death by 1000 cuts, but a looping off his legacy. Fallout involved canceling, renaming, or halting César Chávez events and honors. The biggest pattern is that local governments, unions, churches, and community groups have been pulling back from celebrations tied to César Chávez.
The public occasionally cuts an egregious TP a break. One trait they never overlook —a lecherous hypocrite, especially one who takes advantage of the very people he purports to help. This is anathema to tall poppydom, where servitude, not advantage of fellow man, is primacy.
The loss of a dead man's legacy cannot exactly be equated to justice.
For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few. Matt 7:14 (ESV)
Tall Poppy Syndrome Newsletter
Join the newsletter to receive the latest updates in your inbox.
